TUNE-YARDS - REAL LIVE FLESH
February 08, 2010,
Written by Kate Bradley
Label: 4AD
Release Date: 8/02/10
Website: Official Site
Capital letter misuse and shocking pink and yellow websites aren’t usually my preference when investigating new music, I must admit. Even on a good day, the first flash of fuchsia and I’m out. Fortunately, I heard tUnE-yArDs’ track ‘Real Live Flesh’ before I’d explored the artist’s online portfolio.
tUnE-yArDs is the moniker of New England musician Merill Garbus, neither name easy to type out first time, believe me. The single Real Live Flesh is intriguing from the off, beginning with strange, off-kilter noises and distant percussion, followed by spasmodic licks of bass under difficult-to-decipher lyrics.
Androgynous vocals get lost in the mix, every line sounding like a backing vocal, heavy with echo. Whatever is being said, it is sung as if in a dream, airy and soft around the edges: it is enticing and unusual. The vocal melody dips and arches through octaves, the mind carried along in the psychedelic repetition and minimalistic bursts of sound. The tune is catchy, especially in what seems to be the chorus, but not simple or unoriginal.
Somehow, I expected the song to ‘start’ after about the first minute: I anticipated the vocals to suddenly come to the fore, the rhythms to change, maybe a blast of guitar to surge in and take over. Instead, for the full three minutes, the song stays true to its quirkiness, the vocals never freed from their reverb. It is by no means a bad thing, there being enough going on (especially in the rich, scattered bass line and many layers of graceful vocals) to sustain interest and appeal for a whole track. An album of tracks like this would lose me (unless I was on LSD at the time), but for one song, I think anyone could allow themselves to get lost in its pleasant ambiance.
Rating: 7.5/10
Related Posts
danny - 12/03/10
This is absolute, unmitigated, GENIUS. Contender for my favourite video ever I think! Absolutely sick song too, prefer it to Ambling Alp fo sho. [view article]
danny - 12/03/10
This girl is amaaaazing! [view article]
duncan - 12/03/10
Nirvana, mainly because they were over and done with before I was musically conscious so Dave Grohl couldn't ruin them for me by how intrinsically annoying he is. [view article]
Will - 12/03/10
We are including all his musical directions in the debate, which is why we're discussing whether he was better in Foo Fighters or Probot also. Facts are he is a better drummer than he is a guitarist or vocalist, and as we're debating which band he was best in rather than which band he made the best, he thus performed better in Nirvana and QOTSA. To repeat what some of the others have said, he's been good in Foos and had a lot of fame, but hasn't been nearly as influential or impressive as in the bands beforehand. [view article]
Aaron - 11/03/10
Sure, but since Grohl has played his hand at many different musical directions its important to include all of them in this debate in order to find out when he was at his best. Otherwise It'd be a debate about when he was the best drummer... For the record, I do think he's a really good drummer. But doesn't it take a little something away from QOTSA as a band and Grohl himself, if were just going to consider his one off involvement with the group as his crowning moment? I've always been a fan of that band, way before Grohl ever did SFTD with them and though he was a great addition, it's not like the album was carried on his drumming alone. QOTSA are an awesome band regardless of whether Grohl played with them or not. [view article]